Facebook

I remember Michael Hesseman’s well-researched conference in favor of the film. Dogmas form in favor and against what would be significant but questioned findings. I met Santilli in London in the 90’s and he seemed sincere but unhappy with the burden. The alleged cameraman may have been in Orlando. I welcome if R. Santilli releases the film for inspection. This could help to determine the truth.

why would he make the comparison to da vinci's restored works if this film is "authentic"? re-enactments are by definition different from the original...

Yes. This revelation has been easily obtainable for years if one has been paying attention. Of course they the controllers can never show the actual film. However showing a recreation is wholly possible. The film broadcast on TV was and is of course fake but what it depicts was the actual reality if you will. If one is a serious student of the UFO subject particularly in how the slight of hand of the intelligence agencies involved one must come to understand the "necessities" involved. What is always required is a way out, the option of a cover story. It's just the way these things work. The evidence that supports all of this has been around for a long time. The autopsy film is a recreation of a real event.

For those who find this interesting.

"COLIN WOOLFORD – ALIEN AUTOPSY – UPDATED"

http://projectcamelotportal.com/2019/05/20/colin-woolford-alien-autopsy/

You know what...who cares! I don't care anymore, same old rehash. This is real, this isn't 20 years later reverse it lol. If you wanna know the truth meditate, take some shrooms, keep a dream journal, go out into nature by yourself, take some reversion therapy most likely they took most of you in your sleep anyway both the Greys and the Feds too for that matter. The answer is beyond anything here, beyond the gatekeepers and the ufologists, same thing right? Lol
Don't look to others. Do you need a priest to talk to God? No. So why should this be any different? Leaks are cool and interesting but the real deal is out there waiting for you on a one to one.

Bullshit

I have no doubt that there probably is a genuine Roswell autopsy film somewhere but the Santilli film is not it. It was a hoax and all of those involved in it have been extensively been written about. Most serious researchers dismissed it and it has proven to be a murky tale throughout. GH.

Well that's interesting but I never believed that was a real autopsy. I still don't. But interesting.

This line defines it very clearly; " re-enactment and technology is used in the restoration process." Sorry, but "re-enactment", from my perspective as an award winning Director and Producer who has done countless re-enactments, are NOT "restoration". It is acting out or mimicking something that was possibly authentic, or possibly someone's fantasy or interpretation and nothing more than that. Unfortunately, it is not the authentic piece of art, or in this case, the real alien autopsy film (if there even is one). As Jason Goldthorpe mentions above, it is regrettably unfortunate that this is "tied in with prestigious events unfolding at the present."

Spyros Melaris here we go again with Colin Woolfool.

Grant do you promote anything that's actually real?

Utter garbage. The autopsy is not real.

I find it interesting that Every time something of interest goes on, the fakery has a come back. 🙄

OK...Let us for just one nano second accept that Santilli is telling the truth. WHO restored the supposed REAL FILM?? Someone MUST HAVE done this work yes??

Why can't they be named? Santilli talks about "the film is a restoration of original footage and undertaken with great expertise by extremely talented and experienced individuals." Oh really... that is excellent information...WHO are these people? It isn't a secret any more is it?? Why can't they be named?
Let's move on...He says "With still image…paint, sealants and a variety of chemicals are used for restoration and with moving image… re-enactment and technology is used in the restoration process."

OK... so re-enactment is admitted although misleading this means that someone simply copied the film and SHOT IT AGAIN!!! So who are these "fantasists and obsessional personalities who today have come out and stated they “made” the film and who have attempted to create a paper trail to prove an involvement." ???

He doesn't actually name me fear of being sued, but hey, I think this is enough to take him to task over. He must be talking about me, otherwise who else?

But let us re visit that 'Re-Enactment' bit... who made the reenactment?

Me LOL But it wasn't a copy of anything. You see, there is no, and has never been any real film. What he is saying John and I did is actually WAAAAAY more impressive than what we actually did (which was impressive non the less :) ) To copy an existing film from a few frames as Santilli claims is a lot more difficult than to just make one up.

I do not appreciate being called a fantasist, and as far as I am concerned, the gloves are off.

I will keep you all informed of what happens next.
All the best,
Spyros Melaris.

I think you took the gloves off on my show where you actually challenged Santilli then. If I had time I'd transcribe it but I'm currently up to something. *wiggles eyebrows*

I'm interested to see what happens next. What can Santilli do really? You've got him over the proverbial barrel. Xx

With the critical nature of the process of disclosure and those behind the scenes who, for whatever reason, want to quell the truth I detect a bit of the Art of War here... divide and conquer. Too often the truth is diminished if not discarded entirely because of the infighting.

When I first entered the fray in the late 80s this film was the talk of the town, so to speak. Many years later Jonathan Frakes hosted a show on Roswell, where there was one sentence only where he mentions the EBEs, one still being alive when they found them. No other mention was made. The truth was 'leaked' in that one sentence.

As we all know myths are based on fact and embellished to suit the designs of the storytellers and/or their purveyors. I knew a gentleman in the late 80s who had a scientist friend at Edwards. This friend had access to files and copied the paper files that were from the Roswell crash, unredacted, and delivered them to this gentleman. I saw them.

Some time before we met, after the delivery, this gentleman had MIB and fatigue-wearing personnel ransack his home looking for the papers. Strangely and quite humorously, they were in an office box on the back seat of his car in plain sight. The guys noticed them, but didn't look, expecting that they were hidden somewhere instead. I doubt they would be following false leads.

The files do mention the EBEs, including the 'live' one. They included the list of eyes privy to the report which, among them, was Prescott Bush. I don't recall the others as it was long ago. I'm impressed with the tenacity you have, Grant, and feel that you're a well-grounded fact-finding kinda guy that doesn't get swayed by the nonsense. Our meeting is a testament to that, though maybe you still don't take me seriously. I'm okay with that. ;)

Credibility can be lost in a moment....This is one of those moments

If the original film, assuming there is one, was enhanced and cleaned up, that would be amazing. There are so many ways to protect and enhance original images and if the alien autopsy film is legit, then safeguarding it by experts in the craft is a great thing. Creating a re-enactment is a totally different artistic endeavor. No matter how good or true to the facts a re-enactment is, it still is not the actual thing. That’s the same as seeing an artist’s rendition of a distant planet versus the actual imaging of it. As close as they may be, it is not the actual image.

If someone can explain the relevance of the film to the other documents released I would love to understand the link. At present, I just don’t get it at all.

Watch the latest Linda Moulton Howe.

For those interested in this.
This was actually posted on Philip Mantle's FB page by Gari Jones, its actually quite interesting to listen what the late Dr. Roger Leir says about it.

"Gari Jones Never seen anyone address this fully, the part he says about the 17 other physicians and they couldn't identify the organs and also the techniques used were correct for autopsying a cadaver. The rotating of the thigh when the leg is raised, the way the tissues came apart and the most interesting detail is for me how the blood comes from the inside of the tissues... there is no heartbeat so no pulse and therefore no blood or liquid is released, only what would have remained in the tissue after death being released. I like the conclusion of this... some highly organised and detailed training film."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3NwgD6HmUQ&t=2m54s

https://www.facebook.com/philip.mantle.9/posts/10158596306108266

A restoration is by nature the original document/art work/film/photograph/ et al...
If it’s a re-enacting it’s a remake. Therefore NOT original and therefore someone’s interpretation of events. Much like The Mutiny on the Bounty or the Battle of Britain movies are NOT the real thing.
Like it or not these are hoaxes depicting a real event. Even so their still hoaxes...
So if Santilli’s film is a re-enactment it’s still a hoax and one (or several) persons interpretation of an event.
It doesn’t matter if the actual event did take place.
It’s still a hoax.

I have heard of such film but never seen one the closest I ever seen a alien species situational was Dr.Greer and team that worked over that little itty bitty thing I saw it and rolled my eyes up to the heavens muttering please god lol let them not be ankle biters lol

I’m interested in viewing the alien autopsy film intrigued

Original ? Lol

I would like to make only one observation on this thread. Its an interesting time as allegedly real news begins to surface from secret government involvement in ufo research. How long did we anticipate it would be before agencies inserted assets to provide fire exits to quell real public progress. Its important to question motivation for those who have re opened old territory which has proven effective smoke screens in the past. Recent days the authenticity of a famous crop circle has been re opened, the crop circle resembling an alien holding a disc. All hell let loose between believers and hoaxers is now under way. Now very timely we have another subject of which ive sat in the front row, with my close friend of ‘Troggs’ pop group fame, Reg Presley sat in Ray Santilli office in London and shown two Alleged real movie films of the Alien Autopsy. That was before the whole package was orchestrated into the public domain via Fox in the United States. The only reason i am inserting any comment here, is to warn all of the process of division and smoke screens. In my experience of this well trodent subject, Philip Mantle did a good job and hands on investigation into this at the time and long after. Please dont allow ourselves to be further divided at a crucial time.

The Alien crop circle was effective as a generator of belief, belief in it as real or hoax. Both can be true, especially when masters of social engineering like ‘Disney’ are ‘employed’. The Alien Autopsy was manufactured as stated in this thread but the value of carefully engineered production by a mysterious Chessplayer should not be lost in the broadest context. We should not require others to guide what we have inside us.

Sadly, this eloquent statement doesn't dilute the unfortunate fact that the Alien Autopsy was a FAKE (albeit a well made one) and it didn't promote the cause exactly for that cause ... it only gave the debunkers more fodder for the grinder.