Facebook

Regarding "Sara" (Rebekah Roth and Monika Gainor)

I have recently been contacted by several of my Facebook friends and show listeners regarding Rebekah Roth (who will here after be referred to by her real name: Sara). Their concern was a video put out by Jim Fetzer, which questioned her identity. Each of them asked my thoughts on the video and asked me whether I thought "Sara" was who she said she was. Several had concerns about whether she was a fraud and/or a CIA agent. Because of such concerns, I decided to conduct my own investigation. Before we get started, I would like to say that I do not know "Sara". I have only talked to her very briefly on Facebook. I have never appeared on her show and she has not appeared on my show. Further, let me say that I am not actively involved in the 9-11 truth movement. I do not publicly share my views on the subject of 9-11 other than to say that it was a government operation done by the US Government and Israel, and not 19 Muslims with box cutters. Other than that, I could care less what anybody thinks the details of that day are. In my opinion, the only relevant details are what I just stated. I believe that arguing about the details of how, instead of who, only divides the 9-11 truth movement. In other words, I have no bone to pick over "Sara's" 9-11 theories and I do think that Fetzer did a disservice to both of them by arguing about "Sara's" theories about 9-11.

Through my investigation I have discovered that Rebekah's real name is "Sara ---------------". I know her entire name but will not disclose it for privacy reasons. I have also learned much other information about "Sara" and will disclose some of it in this article. Some I will hold back and release later, if necessary, to counter any further mistruths that result from this posting. Trust me when I say I have the evidence to back up what is in this posting. I have no intention of damaging "Sara" but only have an intention to disclose to my followers what "Sara" says must be examined with extreme caution.

"Sara" just recently turned 59 years old. She likes to portray herself as a grandmotherly figure of age 65. That is not the case. In 1972, when she alleges her flight attendant career started, she was only 15 years old. By her own admission, flight attendants in the 1970's needed to be at least 21 years old because they needed to serve alcohol as part of their work duties. Thus, it is unlikely that she was a flight attendant in 1972. After graduating high school in 1974, "Sara" went on to college. While it is possible that "Sara" could have worked as a flight attendant and attended college at the same time, it is unlikely due to the challenge of attending college and making overnight flights out of town. Further, again, "Sara"did not turn 21 until late 1977. Thus, by her own admission, this would have disqualified "Sara" from becoming a flight attendant until late 1977.

"Sara" likes to "prove" she was a flight attendant by asking questions like "How would I know _______ if I wasn't a flight attendant?" One way would be to have family or friends in the airline industry. "Sara" has admitted to having friends that are flight attendants, which is not surprising considering "Sara" lives near a major airport. Further, "Sara's" sister has a work history that includes employment for Boeing. I suspect that "Sara" could obtain some airline information from her sister at Boeing.

Is it possible that "Sara" was still a flight attendant? Consider this information. "Sara" was recently contacted by not one, but two sources that I am close to. Both sources merely requested that she provide one picture of "Sara" as a flight attendant in order to calm people's concerns that she is not who she says she is. In one conversation, "Sara" responded that her basement flooded and she had moved many times and therefore, couldn't provide a photo. To me, this is about the same as saying my dog ate my homework. Regardless, "Sara" responded that it was nobody's "fucking business" who she was. To me, this is very troubling. As a matter of fact, I am open about the fact that I was a US Government attorney from 2000-2006. My former position is certainly at a higher security clearance than a flight attendant. Yet, I can provide proof of my former employment if I need to, despite the fact that my basement flooded with 18 inches of water 3 years ago and I moved 6 countries away from the US. My dog didn't eat all of my records. Nor were they destroyed in a flood. When I searched for "Sara's" work history I came up with the following employers:

-A hospital -A newspaper -A church -A university Etc.

And several other employers. None of these 10+ employers are in the airline industry.

I decided to use another method to double check her work history and came up with the following as her most recent employer:

Here is a list of specific occupations from the bureau of labor statistics for Protective Service Occupations.

It’s very troubling to me that her occupation came back as “Protective Service Occupation” as the vast majority of those occupations are with the government. Although most of the positions are with state government, this designation does cover 143,110 in the Federal Executive Branch. Also note that a search for her sister’s occupation (the one that supposedly works for Boeing) came back with the same occupation on this search.

Of further interest is the reference to “Sara” having a graduate/professional degree. I think that having such a degree would be highly unlikely for someone that worked for 30 years as a flight attendant. When would she have earned such a degree? Her list of 10+ menial jobs on another site doesn’t reflect someone with an advanced degree. The two employment sites provide very different information and may be indicating an attempt to conceal the nature of “Sara’s” real occupation.

However you slice it, the employment and education history are not typical of someone with 30 years of work as a flight attendant.

"Sara" likes to talk about how she is married and has 5 kids and 7 grandchildren. The only records I have been able to find regarding this subject are her marriage records, which ended in divorce in the late 1990's and birth records for two children. I have not found any records that either of these two children have provided any grandchildren for "Sara". Both children are in their mid-late twenties. I am 100% certain that Sara had only two children by age 51. Did she get pregnant or adopt after that date? Very unlikely. I have also found no information that indicates "Sara" remarried. Interestingly enough, I have not been able to find even one picture of "Sara" readily available on the Internet. All pictures of her on the public internet have been wiped clean. Even her own family members do not have even one old picture of her on their Facebook pages. Could an ordinary person have such a complete and thorough wiping clean of his or her photos? Note that I am not talking about the "Rebekah Roth" photos where she appears in disguise in a wig and glasses. I have only been able to find one picture of her from the 1970's that I found through an alternate means. Such picture appears with this article and is somewhat blurry because I had to enlarge it.

"Sara" when confronted about who she really is, will often respond that it doesn't matter because she is a fiction writer. She likes to compare herself to JK Rowling. A more accurate comparison is to Milli Vanilli. Here is why I think her comparison is flawed and why who she is does matter. JK Rowling is a writer of fiction. "Sara" is a writer of fiction based on real events. Further, "Sara" has become a major player in the 9-11 movement, not for writing fiction, but for supposedly exposing real events related to 9-11. Much of her public persona is based on information she supposedly gained while being a flight attendant. Would her place in the 9-11 movement and her meteoric rise have been the same if she were merely a church employee or a hospital employee writing a book about 9-11? Very unlikely. When "Sara" was confronted with her real name, she was silent for nearly 10 seconds, apparently stunned that someone could discover her true identity. She then responded with a "Is that who you think I am?" Instead of saying what most would say "Who is that?".

I would like to make a couple of comments about the Jim Fetzer video about this subject. Such video discusses a source tracing "Sara's" IP address to Langley, VA, which happens to be the location of CIA headquarters. I have no further information on this except to note the following. When "Sara" was confronted about this, she didn't deny it. Instead she stated that it was due to setting up proxy servers to hide her location. Would you allow a proxy server of yours to point to the location of the CIA? I don’t think anybody would do that. Further, such video discusses the videos of Monika Gainor and the phixyourhealth team and the related sales of essential oils. "Sara" has indicated that Monika Gainor is her friend and that she provided an acknowledgement to phixyourhealth in her book. I think it's curious that salespeople of essential oils are acknowledged in a book about 9-11. Nonetheless, I think it's undeniable that the voice in the phixyourhealth infomercials is "Sara". Whether the picture of Monika Gainor is "Sara" or not is not relevant. What needs to be taken from this is that "Sara" likes to have aliases and has at least two, Monika Gainor and Rebekah Roth. Even when confronted with the obvious truth that her voice was used as Monika Gainor, she refuses to admit it and didn't deny it.

I don't like to get involved in squabbles but I feel my first duty is to provide accurate information to my followers. I have neither exaggerated the facts in this article nor stated things that I can't back up. From the information I provided, my followers should be able to make an informed decision about the information provided by "Sara". I have only written this article after "Sara" was given multiple opportunities to come clean and has refused to do so.